Sunday, September 16, 2012

To be continued. . .

I've struggled to keep up with this blog, for a variety of reasons. The biggest being my dislike of feeling 'vulnerable'. The idea of putting my thoughts and experiences out there for strangers to see, as well as family and friends, makes me anxious. I fear not being good enough. I fear that I won't be able to express myself well enough to be understood. And I fear that my feelings will not be respected, but mocked instead. I've tried to keep in mind my reasons for writing in the first place, my original intention of telling my story, in my words, for my posterity. But the praise I've received for my writing gets in the way, and my ego gets involved, and I develop writer's block from the anxiety, and months go by without a word from my pen (or computer!). And I get more anxious. Arghhhhhh. . . . I need to push through the anxiety and vulnerability, and just be. Because it's not about you, and it's not about me. It's about the story. It's about the journey.

I was born of goodly parents. Isn't that how most Mormon stories begin? Good, kind, earnest people, who wanted only to live according to God's plan. And to bring their offspring along for the ride, kicking and screaming if need be. My parents both suffered difficult childhoods, with alcohol and abuse playing a big role. They were both descended from original Mormon pioneers, but their own parents were not particular about following the plan, and my parents both learned at an early age the lesson that church = stability. Relatives who had fallen by the wayside suffered a variety of social ills, and their lives generally did not end well. My parents decided that they would hold tight to the iron rod, and benefit from the safety of the fold. They married in the temple when my mom was 17, my dad 21. And to my knowledge, neither has experienced any doubts about the path they chose to follow.

My family was the quintessential Mormon family of the sixties and seventies. If there was a meeting, we were there. A potluck dinner, a cannery assignment, a temple trip, we attended them all. Attendance was so important to my parents that I can remember a Sunday when I'd been throwing up all morning, and they left me on the couch by myself while they attended Sunday School. I was 10. I needed and wanted my mom to be with me, but it was Sunday, and church came first. Always. My older brother fell head first off his bike one Sunday, and after taking him to have his face stitched back together, my parents went to sacrament meeting. They weren't cold and heartless, they were just faithful and active. They were Mormon to the core, testimony-bearing, tithe-paying, temple-attending, hymn-singing, faithful Latter-Day-Saints. To this day, I don't think either one of them has turned down a calling. Saying no has never been an option. They believe the church to be headed by Christ himself, and the prophets and apostles are His voice to His people. And that extends all the way down to the local leaders, so when the Bishop extends a call for service, it's as if the Lord has spoken. My parents are true believers.

Being raised by such righteous, gospel-loving, church-attending folks should have led to a testimony of my own. And that notion has led to one of the great puzzles of my life. Why couldn't I believe as they did, immersed in it as I was? Why was it not as simple for me as it was for them? Granted, I don't know for sure that they have never doubted, but they have certainly never given voice to any uncertainty about the church. And it was expected of us, their children, that we would follow in their footsteps and continue faithful, as they have. Alas, as it stands currently, their offspring are at 50% and falling.

There are eight children in my family. Two older brothers preceded me, then five more boys followed. I'm the only girl. Three of those younger brothers left the church in their early twenties, soon after each returned from serving a mission. In talking with them since my own disaffection, the reasons they gave for becoming inactive was a combination of laziness, the desire to sin (that old devil, alcohol!), and a general inability to convince themselves to believe in the truthfulness of the church. Their falling away was very painful for my parents, especially my mother, who internalized the saying, "No success can compensate for failure in the home". In her mind, she had failed with these sons. If she had done a better job, been a better example, loved them more, they would have continued faithful. I heard her say on several occasions, "Where did I go wrong?" She agonized over their apostasy, cried many tears, doubled down on her efforts to strengthen her own testimony. She expressed to me her heartbreak that her family might not be together in the next life, and found some comfort in the teachings of past prophets who said that children who have been sealed to their parents in the temple will not be lost, but are bound to faithful parents. I personally find this teaching to be manipulative and slightly creepy, and in blatant violation of one of the basic tenets of the religion, the agency to choose. But, to my mother, it is hopeful. And I understand her need to cling to hope when faced with her sons willful rejection of religion, at least as she sees it.

I also have an older brother who left the church for several years during his young adulthood. He came back in his late twenties, a joyous occasion for my parents. He has proved to be one of the most stalwart of the bunch, but the particulars of his story are unknown to me as he and I don't share details of our lives with one another. We are content to be siblings who get along for the sake of our mother, nothing more. I suspect that if he were aware of my current religious leanings, he would be less than accepting, judging by his generally self-righteous, condescending personality. No love lost there! ;)

As a child, I remember sitting on the pew with my mom and brothers, my dad on the stand serving as a member of the bishopric, struggling to maintain any level of interest in the proceedings. Church was, and is, boring. And I frequently felt my mother's fingers pinching the tender skin on the underside of my arm in an effort to bring my attention back to the service. It worked momentarily, then my mind would wander again, or I would pester one of my siblings, or be pestered, or find some other way to pass the time. I was never very moved by what was being said, or the tears shed in the bearing of a testimony, though I always enjoyed some of the wackier stories told by the few regulars we could count on feeling the spirit and desiring to share. I remember once, a friend and I put Vick's Vaporub underneath our eyes to make them water, and we pretended to be moved to tears by the sharing and bearing of testimonies. The only draw church had for me was social. I loved seeing my friends, sitting with them rather than my family once I became a teenager (this was not discouraged back in the good 'ol days), giggling at the boys, passing notes, mocking our elders. But the spirit never testified to me that what was going on around me was 'true', or that it had any value beyond the fun of hanging out with my peers. And that didn't worry me as a youngster. Maybe it was a clue of things to come.



9 comments:

  1. I stumbled across your blog and find it interesting. My husband's sister has also left the church and is struggling with it. Your comments about your family are so similar to what we hear from my sister-in-law. I'm wondering if your family has read your blog and what they think.

    As in most things, there are usually 2 sides to every story, and I'm curious about yours. You use the incident of your parents going to church after your brother was injured, but I can't help but wonder what the other side of that story is. Was there something else going on at church? Were all your siblings at church? Did one of them have something going on there?

    I know that this sort of thing may seem to miss your larger point, but the name of your blog indicates that nobody can see how you see things, but then you accuse one of your siblings of being condescending. You seem intelligent enough to see the irony there.

    Please don't interpret my comment as antagonistic. I'm interested in reading the rest of your writings, and realize I may be missing something.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for commenting! I agree that there are two sides to every story, in fact, often more than 2. I've tried not to paint my parents as cold and unfeeling, as they are anything but. I am, however, attempting to chronicle my own journey through and away from Mormonism, and my own perspective throughout my childhood. I'm sure if my parents were to write their own blog, and described the same time period, it would look much different. And I would probably not come off as well! That being said, my story is by no means done; there is much yet to be written. I wish the only obligation I had were to this blog! Alas, my real life beckons all too often, and writing takes a back seat. Or gets tied to the back of the car to bounce along behind like tin cans behind a newlywed's vehicle.
    About the title. . . I've always found it to be pretentious. My daughter set up the blog for me, and wrote that little blurb at the beginning, and I was too lazy to change it. Maybe I should, huh? I really don't see myself as a visionary who sees what others don't. At the same time, my perspective is as unique as anyone else's, and it is my blog, about me and my journey. And, if you read back far enough, you'll see that my main purpose is to leave behind words that will attempt to explain myself to my posterity after I'm gone. I want them to understand me using my own words, not the words of someone who sees me only as a heathen apostate.
    And I'm not offended at anything you had to say. By making my blog public, I leave myself open to other's opinions, and cannot complain just because they don't happen to agree with my positions. I just appreciate you taking time to respond. (As I already said!) So, thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love this! You have a really nice writing voice. I admit to being a tad jealous that you had such wonderful friends in high school, and that I laughed at the story about putting the Vicks Vaporub underneath your eyes.

    I particularly love that this is a story about you and your upbringing. It will be interesting to see how you've grown and developed. What things have influenced you to be the person you are today. Anyway, I enjoyed reading your blog. It is lovely, and I look forward to reading more.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Vicks Vapo Rub...why didn't I think of that??? I especially like that you spent time, "giggling at the boys, passing notes and mocking your elders." That paints a lovely scene!

    I'm so glad you're here to share your story. It takes courage to be vulnerable about your journey. *glass raised* Here's to your journey!!!

    xo

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey, how did I miss this one? Teri

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I had told myself that commenting on your blog in response to Ms. karen was pointless, but I truly couldn't sleep last night thinking of all the things I WANT to say to her, but can't.... but there is something I just can't let go until I say it. So, please excuse me while I step up on my soap-box for a moment.
    Ms. karen:
    You are definitely "missing something". You state, "the name of your blog indicates that nobody can see how you see things"..... I must step in and say, WTF? Seriously??? Myrtlejoy's heading states that "others are reluctant to see"..... not that they can't or won't.... just that they are RELUCTANT. Nowhere does she imply that she is being inclusive of everyone. She simply states "others". You, Ms. karen, fit into that catagory of "others" because you are more than reluctant to see things in her technicolor view, you stomp your little feet and refuse because you don't see things the way she does. Frankly, "Faithful" Mormons like yourself are why Mormons like me struggle with our faith at times (ha! bet you didn't guess I'm a Mormon). It's your self-righteous, pious attitude that makes "others" like myself think of slitting our wrists instead of sitting one more Sabbath next to you at church. You say you are not intending to be antagonistic, yet you are! By being so judgmental and arrogant, you are missing out on one of the BEST people that has ever graced this planet. So Ms. karen, sit back, shut up and listen..... Myrtlejoy is wise beyond her years. Appreciate her for who/what she is or go away. Some of us ENJOY this blog.
    (stepping down off soap-box now)

    ReplyDelete
  8. First, I LOVED the first paragraph - talking about the anxiety of wanting to be loved and not wanting to be mocked and wanting to be understood... and then all of that making it so you can't write anything. I hate that you have felt that, and it feels so validating to read my own feelings in your words.

    Thank you for sharing your story and your experiences. I love your voice! (I hope that doesn't cause more anxiety.)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Not at all, Jen. I do like knowing that I have a few faithful readers out there, and that I've touched someone with my words. So thanks for letting me know that!
    My anxiety is self-inflicted, and I'm working on it. I need to ignore my negative thoughts, and focus on what I believe to be true, and how to best share that. I'm a work in progress!

    ReplyDelete