I wrote a post this week about courage, comparing my bravery in leaving the church to that of my pioneer forebears who crossed the plains on foot.
Today I listened to a Mormon Stories podcast, and I'd like to amend my previous definition of courage.
Laurie Lee Hall (http://www.mormonstories.org/laurie-lee-hall/) was a convert to the church. She served a mission, then married her best friend in the temple. Eventually, Laurie became the chief architect for the church's temples. She was called to be a bishop, then a stake president, serving for 8 years.
At the time, Laurie was a man. A man who, since she was a child, knew her true gender was female.
Laurie lived with this secret knowledge until well into her fifties. She suffered greatly for her gender dysphoria, unable to be true to who she knew she was, unable to be at peace in a man's body. She struggled with depression and suicidal thoughts until she knew she could take no more, and must become on the outside the woman she knew herself to be on the inside.
I cannot imagine the courage it took to reveal her true gender to her wife, and then her children. And then her church congregation.
As I watched Laurie tearfully describe her journey, articulating with eloquence the difficulties she faced in becoming the woman she was always meant to be, my heart was touched by her courage. I cried with her as she chronicled her release as stake president, and then her excommunication from the church to which she had devoted her life. She is still a believer in that church. She testified of God's love, and, listening to her, I felt my own heart stir. I was not converted by her testimony, but I knew that she, with her great faith, still believed in that God, and she believed that He had not forgotten her.
This woman, Laurie Lee Hall, is a pioneer. A courageous, brave, beautiful pioneer.
Thank you, Laurie, for being brave enough to share your story with the world. And thank you for having the courage to live that story out loud.
I see the world in shades of color that others are reluctant to see. This is my attempt at sharing my technicolored visions.
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
Sunday, July 23, 2017
Pioneers
I come from Mormon pioneer stock, on both sides of my family
tree. Pioneer stories are woven into the fabric of my childhood. Our parents
loved to regale us with tales of bravery and courage exhibited by those who
abandoned hearth and home in pursuit of religious freedom.
I wasn’t a fan of such stories as a youth. I always felt
that I didn’t measure up in some crucial way. I didn’t load my belongings into
a handcart and pull it across the plains; any complaint of mine seemed trivial
in comparison.
“Pioneer children sang as they walked”…. singing this song
in primary didn’t make me admire those legendary children who didn’t complain and
whine as they left bloody footprints on the trail. Rather, I felt resentment
that their example was being held up as the epitome of faithful childhood. I
mean, come on! Any ancestor of mine had to have bitched and moaned and, to use
their vernacular, murmured. Any singing
was under duress. I can imagine my pioneer great-great-great-great-great
grandmother hissing to her young daughter as they walked beside the wagon,
telling her to “Buck up, buttercup! Your ancestors braved worse than you are
being called to bear! Stop that whining before I give you something to really
cry about! Here comes Brother Brigham… act happy!!”
Replace “Brother Brigham” with “the bishop”, and you have my
childhood in a pew.
Several years ago, when I was mostly a believer, I took my
own young family to Nauvoo, the birthplace of these tales of courage and
perseverance. We walked through the restored town, eventually wandering down
the road that led to the great Mississippi. We paused at the spot from which these
brave pioneers launched the ferry that took them across the icy river, seeking
refuge from the mobocrats who sought their destruction. I watched my own small
daughter play at the water’s edge, and felt, for just a moment, what my ancestor
must have felt as she contemplated the journey ahead. What lay behind, clouded in controversy from my vantage point today, spurred this faithful mother
to take her young family, including a newborn, into an unknown wilderness. She
believed strongly in the doctrine as she had learned it, and fervently wished
for nothing more than the space in which to live the principles of the gospel
she loved. She did it for her little ones, those to whom she wished to impart
her faith and love for this church to which she had converted, leaving her own
family and loved ones behind.
I don’t know all the particulars of the life she was
leaving, but I imagine her own family, her parents and siblings, did not
understand her new faith, and grieved her departure from the beliefs and
practices with which she had been raised. Her happiness was their sorrow.
I have grown up under the shadow of this great sacrifice,
and have often felt inadequate in the face of their bravery. My ancestors
squared their shoulders and said goodbye to all they knew as they faced a
frightening and unknown world. I have been admonished time and again to follow
their lead and face my future with dauntless determination, “with faith in
every footstep”, honoring their sacrifice by holding fast to the tenets of that
same faith.
My own journey hasn’t been laced with the hardships of a
trek across a hostile wilderness, but I, too, am a pioneer. I have had to square
my shoulders and face my loved ones with the news that I have abandoned their
faith, and am striking out on my own.
My parents had (and have) a rock-solid faith in Mormonism.
They raised us with hope that we would follow their example. That I managed to
do so for almost 50 years is a testament to the strength of their faith. But
for most of those 50 years, I struggled with doubt. I always managed to come
back to faith in the gospel, in part because I couldn’t bear to disappoint my
parents. I knew they would feel like failures if I rejected what was most
precious to them. But, ultimately, it came down to integrity. I could not
continue to profess a belief in that which I did not believe to be true.
It took me three years to get the courage to face my mother
with my disbelief. Looking into her eyes and telling her that I did not believe
in the church, and no longer considered myself to be religious, was the single
most difficult thing I have ever had to do. Seeing the pain in her eyes, and
hearing the grief in her voice, knowing that I was the cause of her distress,
is a torment I hope to never have to repeat in this lifetime.
Think that didn’t take courage?
I didn’t walk for miles across the wilderness, and I didn’t
struggle to provide food and shelter for my little ones in hostile territory,
and I didn’t leave my loved ones in shallow graves alongside the trail, but I
do know what it is to strike out into unknown territory. I do know the pain of
disavowing the faith of my fathers. I do know what it feels like to break my
mother’s heart by rejecting that which was most precious to her.
I can see the hubris in comparing myself to the much
venerated pioneers of yore, but, in the words of Coco Chanel, “The most
courageous act is still to think for yourself. Aloud.”
I am thinking for myself, aloud, and while it has brought me
to a place of peace, and, dare I say, happiness, I know that my joy is my
mother’s sorrow. I don’t take her grief lightly, but I am, as my pioneer
forebears, willing to risk pain in pursuit of truth.
I am following in the footsteps of my courageous ancestor,
honoring her quest for the right to live according to the dictates of her own
conscience.
I, too, am a pioneer.
Saturday, July 8, 2017
Resilience
My second daughter is getting married this year. She’s 25,
and positively giddy. She and her fiancé have known each other for several
years, and have been living together for almost two years, so they’re probably
about as ready as two people can be.
However, as I watched her face yesterday, as she and her
intended picked out wedding invitations, I was struck with a sense of
foreboding, and I wanted to protect her from the downfall. Because, let’s face
it, one’s coming.
She’s seen a lot of life in her 25 years, from cancer to an abusive boyfriend, so she is well aware that life is unpredictable, and
sometimes shitty. She has learned to navigate some pretty big stuff, more than
most at her tender age. But I fear she believes the worst is behind her. I fear
she thinks she has found her prince, and together they will ride off into the
sunset, and life will be grand from here on out.
And the simple fact is that it won’t.
Because life is shitty sometimes.
To quote The Man in Black, “Life is pain, Highness. Anyone
who says differently is selling something.”
Life is shitty sometimes.
I’ve been married for 28 years, half my life. And as
marriages go, mine is pretty good. ‘Course, I married a pretty great guy, one who
thinks he was lucky to marry me. Not sure how that happened, but I’m one of the
lucky ones. Seems to be an exception to the rule.
Long marriages seem to be rare these days, at least among those of my generation. As I consider the
institution of marriage the way modern America practices it, I’m beginning to
wonder if we are suited to monogamy. I’ve watched many of my friends’ marriages
implode, for multiple reasons from financial distress to sexual improprieties
to irreconcilable differences, and I find myself wondering how my own spouse
and I have managed to get this far. Not sure it is any more complicated than
dumb luck. And a guy who is content with what life has handed him: me.
I’ve watched one friend cope after losing her husband to
cancer. She had recently given birth to their third child when he was
diagnosed, and within a year, he was dead. So, through no fault of her own, her
marriage ended, and she was single. I’m not implying that divorcees are at
fault when their own marriages end; I’m just pointing out that any
relationship, no matter how good, can, and will, end.
Another friend lost her husband last week to a car accident,
an unpredictable and devastating event, leaving her with two young children to
raise alone.
Whether through death or divorce, eventually everyone
leaves. If my daughter lives long enough, she will end up alone. And either
way, whether by death or divorce, her heart will be broken.
And what if her marriage doesn’t end by disaster? Does that
mean she’ll always feel what she feels today? I predict, based on experience,
that the day will come when she will look at him with annoyance rather than
tenderness, wondering if he has to breathe so loud, and if he could possibly do
it in another room. Yes, I know that beneath the annoyance will be gratitude
that he is still breathing at all, but come on, what spouse hasn’t felt just a
titch of irritation from time to time at the sound of his/her beloved’s bodily
functions?
And then there is the reality that people change. The man she is marrying this year may not be the same man 10, 15, 20 years down the road. Ask my husband. He is married to a completely different woman than the one he vowed to love 28 years ago. If he had known then what he knows now, would he have gone through with it? He says yes, but I wonder. I didn't intend to change. I was asked, back in 1987, by a man I thought I loved, if I thought I would always be a Mormon, and I replied that yes, of course, I would always be a Mormon. That was a deal-breaker for him. He wasn't looking for a Mormon, so we went our separate ways. My husband, on the other hand, was looking for a Mormon, and he believed he found one. Neither of us saw the change coming. Neither of us anticipated that someday I would no longer be a Mormon. For some people, as for my former crush, a difference in religion is a deal-breaker. I got lucky, and I happened to marry a man who was able to roll with the change, but it could so easily have ended differently, as it has for many of my friends whose spouses could not accept a change in religious beliefs.
People change. And not always for the better.
And then there is the reality that people change. The man she is marrying this year may not be the same man 10, 15, 20 years down the road. Ask my husband. He is married to a completely different woman than the one he vowed to love 28 years ago. If he had known then what he knows now, would he have gone through with it? He says yes, but I wonder. I didn't intend to change. I was asked, back in 1987, by a man I thought I loved, if I thought I would always be a Mormon, and I replied that yes, of course, I would always be a Mormon. That was a deal-breaker for him. He wasn't looking for a Mormon, so we went our separate ways. My husband, on the other hand, was looking for a Mormon, and he believed he found one. Neither of us saw the change coming. Neither of us anticipated that someday I would no longer be a Mormon. For some people, as for my former crush, a difference in religion is a deal-breaker. I got lucky, and I happened to marry a man who was able to roll with the change, but it could so easily have ended differently, as it has for many of my friends whose spouses could not accept a change in religious beliefs.
People change. And not always for the better.
How do I prepare her for that? How do I inoculate her against
the agony of heartbreak, or the tedium of boredom, or plain old discontent? Or change? What if her atheist fiance finds the allure of religion irresistible? Would that be a deal-breaker?
As I looked at her glowing face yesterday, and contemplated
how I could protect her from the pain of living, I realized the futility of my
desire. Because the fact is, life is shitty sometimes.
I wanted to urge her to savor this moment, this brief flash
of insane happiness, and to relish the feeling of being with the one you love,
and loving the one you’re with. I wanted to warn her of the capriciousness of
life, and the way it can change in an instant, leaving her with empty hands and
a broken heart and a dreary future without the one she thinks she can’t live
without.
Of course, I didn’t tell her any of that. I allowed her to
have her moment of joy. I looked on as she stared into her person’s eyes, and
they shared a tender kiss, and I rejoiced that she gets to have this moment, no
matter how brief.
And I wished that, more than anything, I could give her
resilience. And strength. Because her life will change, again, and it will
bring pain, and heartache, and leave her breathless with grief. And the only
way to cope with all of that is to be resilient. To roll with the punches. To
be flexible enough that the big hurts that break her heart will not kill her
spirit and leave her irreparably broken. To know that, as Celine so eloquently trilled, her heart will
go on. And so must she, in the face of unbearable pain and sorrow. Or
unbelievable boredom and annoyance.
I hope my daughter will never know grief and pain, that she
and the love of her life will have a long and happy marriage, that life’s shit
won’t touch her. But I know, in spite of my hope, that it will.
Because life is shitty sometimes. And it will be alternately
shitty and awesome until she dies. That’s life.
Roll with it, little one. Be resilient.
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
For shame....
Remember that you are absolutely unique. Just like everyone
else. (Margaret Mead.)
There’s a post making the rounds this week addressing that
ridiculous adage we post-Mormons often hear (and hate) about leaving the church
but not leaving it alone. The intended audience of the post is the believing
family and friends left behind, those most apt to utter the aforementioned
words. The author eloquently describes the place our belief had in our lives,
and the difficulty we face when we come to the realization that we no longer
hold those beliefs to be true, and attempt to navigate the rocky post-Mormon
road.
I’m hopeful that the author's words will reach those of my family
members and friends who have struggled to understand why I can’t leave the
church alone, and will perhaps understand me a little better.
However, in my life, the people who most often lob that
accusation my way are those who are traveling this post-Mormon road alongside
me.
As a newbie on this journey, several years ago, I found a
community of like-minded souls through Facebook, and they quickly became my
tribe. We found solace in one another’s stories, and looked for opportunities
to gather together and vent our grievances.
On one such occasion, I had brought along a new friend, who
had also recently left the church. She in turn brought one of her friends, who
had been out of the church for a few years by this time. We met up in a bar,
and the topic of the majority of the conversations that took place that night
centered on the discoveries we had each made of the untruths and deceptions of
the church we had left behind. Anyone who has been down this path understands
the solidarity of hearing one’s own experiences echoed in the stories of others
in similar circumstances. It was camaraderie in the truest sense of the word.
As we left that night, my two friends turned to me and
expressed their dismay that the entire evening had been about Mormonism. Didn’t
we have anything else to talk about? Why couldn’t we leave it alone now that we
had left it?
Sound familiar?
I’ve been in many Facebook groups over the years, a few of
which have been formed based on our common past as Mormons, whether as feminist
Mormons, or former believers married to believers, or women of a certain age
who have found themselves attempting to navigate the minefield of
post-Mormonism in middle-age. Almost invariably, someone will post a request
that Mormon-themed posts be limited, as we have much better things to talk
about than our post-Mormon angst. We need to leave it behind us, not drag it
into our present and continue to hash and rehash our experiences. Why can’t we
leave it alone now that we have left it?
Again, very familiar verbage.
I read a post recently on Reddit about navigating the anger
phase of post-Mormon recovery. One responder commented on his wife’s ease with
which she left the church, once she discovered that it wasn’t true. He had been
out of the church himself for several years by this time, and had been gently
attempting to introduce her to some of the whitewashing in the church’s
history, with limited success. She stumbled across the CES letter, and for her,
that was it. The church wasn’t true, and she was done. No angry phase, no mourning
what she had lost. She was just done, and she moved on. He said of her that
“she is the mentally healthiest ex-Mormon I know.”
Maybe this isn’t so much good mental health as it is a
personality trait. Maybe she isn’t a person who feels the need to process
difficult emotions verbally, including those that generally surface when
leaving an all-encompassing religion such as Mormonism.
I have no idea how she came to her “mentally healthy” state,
but I resent the implication that those of us who have had to wade through a
lot of post-Mormon angsty shit are mentally unhealthy.
The past few years have taught me many things about myself,
one of which is that I have a slow burn, but once my tipping point is reached,
I grieve hard. When I realized the church wasn’t true, I didn’t think anything
in my life would change. I figured that I would keep attending church as I had
for most of my 50+ years, that I would continue wearing garments, that I would
continue paying tithing, that I would continue to abide by the Word of Wisdom
(as understood in the temple recommend interview). I couldn’t envision a
different life for myself at that time.
However, as I began a closer study of this religion I’d been
following, and discovered the many obfuscations and outright deceptions, I
started to feel angry. As I said, it was a slow burn. But once I acknowledged
my anger, and allowed myself to look deeper at the reasons for it, there was
much fuel for this fire. And I couldn’t contain it.
I found myself seeking out like-minded souls with whom to
process my feelings of grief and rage. Leaving Mormonism is by far the hardest
thing I’ve ever done, and had I tried to keep it all inside, I imagine it would
have consumed me.
I feel very fortunate to have found people who were also
attempting to navigate this path, and to have had opportunities to share what I
was thinking and feeling with them.
My husband’s uncle, who had been excommunicated in the 1980s
for heresy, was the first person I encountered as I started down this rocky
path who I knew would understand the difficult position I was in. He gave me
the space to verbalize, for the first time, that I didn’t believe the church
was true. And he welcomed my questions and concerns, and acknowledged my anger.
He will always by one of my heroes for his ability to help me process my own anger
without going up in flames alongside me. I am incredibly grateful that he
didn’t shame me for my anger, nor tell me it was inappropriate or unhealthy. He
helped me direct it toward its rightful target, and pointed me toward useful
information as I sought answers to my many questions. Thank you, Uncle Denny.
Next came John Dehlin, of Mormonstories fame. Back in 2010,
before Facebook had really taken off, John was heavily involved in such
internet sites as staylds.com and newordermormon.net. I first discovered him
through an article, ironically, in the Deseret News, talking about his work
helping people who had come to the realization that the church wasn't true, but
for various reasons needed to figure out how to stay in and be healthy. Through
John, I joined an online ‘ward’, where I found the support I needed as I
attempted to figure out the healthiest path for me. I wasn’t sure how to stay,
but because of my believing husband (and other family members), I wasn’t sure I
could go. John provided the perfect venue at the perfect time where I found
others who ‘got’ it. I got to be as angry as I needed to be, and no one in that
group ever shamed me for it. Thank you, John.
Facebook groups became a thing sometime around 2010-11, and
I joined several that were Mormon-themed, such as Feminist Mormon Housewives,
and Mormonstories, which led to other groups targeted more to those who had
decided to leave the church behind. I cannot express fervently enough my
gratitude for these groups, and the people I met there. I was given the
opportunity to express my anger, rage, frustration, grief, disappointment,
outrage, disillusionment, resentment, and every other negative emotion that arose as
I walked away from the religion of my birth. Anger is a natural reaction to
pain, and leaving Mormonism was fraught with painful experiences. Having a
space to navigate all those emotions proved invaluable on my journey away from
religion. Thank you, Mark Zuckerberg.
Expressing anger isn’t inherently unhealthy. Getting stuck
in the anger phase, maybe. But talking about it with others who understood, and
could relate, helped move me through the stages of grief. My journey hasn’t
proceeded in a linear fashion, and I’ve cycled in and out of grief, rage, and
even depression, multiple times. But as time has gone on, and I’ve hashed and
rehashed my experiences with my new-found friends and soul-mates, I’ve come to
acceptance, and a measure of peace.
My post-Mormon journey hasn’t been smooth sailing, but I am
better for having walked this path. And I’m grateful for those who have walked
with and beside me, holding space for my anger, without an added measure of
shame.
I am Myrtlejoy, and, with a little help from my friends, I
am the mentally healthiest ex-Mormon I know!
Monday, June 5, 2017
Cognitive Dissonance
It’s been almost eight years since I left the church. I’ve
processed a lot of emotions in those years, cycling in and out of grief, anger,
sadness, and even, as unbelievable as it may seem, elation. That’s life, I
guess.
Through it all, my husband has maintained his rock solid
belief that this church is true. More specifically, that the gospel at its core
is true, and that the church is the imperfect chosen vehicle to carry that
gospel to all the earth. He believes that he has been “given to know”, and there is nothing, according to him, that can shake his testimony.
I’ve come to accept this about him, mostly, and have never
attempted to sway his opinion. He knows that I know more than he does about the
founding days of the church, and the prophet of the restoration. We’ve had many
conversations about old Joe, and I’ve resigned myself to the fact that my
husband will never see him as anything but a divinely chosen prophet, seer, and
revelator. He isn’t interested in hearing the more salacious details of Joe’s
polygamous ways in Nauvoo, and we’ve managed to make peace over the issue.
Most days, I’m okay with this. It is what it is.
Every now and then, though, I find myself circling back
around to anger.
One evening last week, after a busy weekend at work, I was
perusing the interwebz looking for a podcast to occupy my time. I have enjoyed
Lindsay Hansen Park’s “Year of Polygamy” series, but I haven’t listened to all
100+ episodes. I know enough of the history that I am able to keep up without
the necessity of listening to each and every episode in order. I find the
history she covers fascinating, and most of the time, I am able to absorb the
details without getting enmeshed in the emotions.
Last Sunday night, I selected a 2-parter on Emma Smith, Joe’s
publicly acknowledged wife. I know this stuff; I read “Mormon Enigma” when it
was first published back in the 1980s. I’ve read Todd Compton’s “In Sacred
Loneliness”, more than once. I’ve read Bushman’s tome, “Rough Stone Rolling”,
and Richard S. Van Wagoner’s “Mormon Polygamy: A History”. I don’t think there
is anything I haven’t read or heard on the subject. I had probably already listened
to this particular podcast. I know this stuff.
However, for some reason, listening again triggered
something in me, and I felt the anger flare up, and a burning, irrational (or
not) hatred of all things polygamous and Mormon.
I looked across the room at my oblivious husband, blissfully
unaware that his spouse was in that moment attempting to destroy him with her
eyes.
He wasn’t ever in any real danger. I know I can’t destroy
people with my eyes. Yet.
But, oh my god. If he could have read my mind, he would
probably have run. Or at least ducked.
How can a person hold two completely opposing beliefs in their
brain and maintain sanity?
How can my husband believe Joseph Smith to be a divinely
appointed prophet of the restoration, worthy of reverent worship, while also
knowing that he was a lying, cheating, husband to Emma?
The story that triggered this emotion detailed the marriage
of Joseph to the Partridge sisters, Emily and Eliza. They were young women who
had been living in the Smith’s home for a couple of years as helpers to Emma.
Unbeknownst to Emma, they had agreed to become celestial, plural wives to
Joseph early in 1943. They were living with Emma, presumably helping care for
her children and assisting with the housework, and sleeping with her husband.
Under her watchful, though oblivious, eye.
By all accounts, Emily and Eliza believed celestial marriage
to be a commandment from God, and they had agreed to join Joseph in holy
matrimony as his wives in name and deed. At the time of the first marriage
ceremony, Emma was unaware of the arrangement.
Within a couple of months of the secret marriage, Joseph had
managed to convince Emma that celestial marriage was a divine principle, and
she agreed to get on board, with the condition that she choose Joseph’s future
wives. She chose the Partridge sisters, unaware that they had already been
joined to her husband as his spiritual wives.
This second marriage was performed with Emma as a witness.
Emma, beloved wife of Joseph, stood by and watched as he
took the two young sisters as brides, for time and eternity. I cannot imagine
the heartache she must have felt in that moment.
Rumors had been swirling around Nauvoo for some time about
Joe’s spiritual wifery. Emma countered the rumors whenever and wherever she
could, insisting that her husband was not involved in such debauchery as plural
marriage. Coming to understand the full extent of his involvement, as the author
of the principle and an eager participant, must have rent her heart in two. And
to be a witness herself? She has earned for herself an exalted place in the
eternities. If such a place exists.
As I contemplated this story, and my husband’s unwavering
testimony of Joseph Smith the prophet, I felt a distinct sense of cognitive
dissonance on his behalf. And rage. And sorrow. I can’t believe he didn’t feel
the force of my glare across the room and wither under its heat. But he didn’t.
He was engrossed in the Sunday afternoon NASCAR race with our son, and remained
unmindful of my distress.
I mulled this over for the next few days, and considered how
the conversation might have gone had I confronted him in the heat of the
moment. Not well, I imagine. Much like other conversations we’ve had about old
Joe. “This isn’t just church history, it’s family history (he is a direct
descendent of Hyrum Smith), and there isn’t anything you can tell me that I don’t
already know.” Yeah, we’ve been down this particular road before, without
resolution. And I really can leave it
alone, letting him believe what he believes. He affords me the same respect,
and our truce has been, for the most part, peaceful.
But I really don’t get it. I don’t.
A few days later, I ran into an old friend from my
church-going days. She has remained a faithful friend, unafraid to be infected
by my apostasy, and I feel comfortable having almost any conversation with her.
Our meeting seemed providential, and I took advantage of the opportunity to
question a true believer about Joe’s divine calling as prophet, and his
penchant for plural marriage.
My friend is so awesome. She truly is. She listened
thoughtfully as I explained my dilemma, and considered her response carefully.
I could tell she took my question seriously, but didn’t take it as an
opportunity to bear her testimony. I appreciate this more than she can know.
My friend responded first by telling me that while she is
aware of the complicated history of the church, and Joseph Smith, she has
chosen to err on the side of believing in his prophetic calling because she
sees the fruits of her belief as overwhelmingly positive. (I am paraphrasing,
as I didn’t record our conversation, and I don’t have a photographic memory! My
apologies if I got anything wrong.)
She then referenced the founding fathers of our nation. She
is a history buff, and knows the salacious details of their very flawed stories,
but finds much to revere and respect in the fruits of their actions, so she is
able to look past their character flaws and appreciate their accomplishments.
She does the same with Joseph Smith. She sees the good that comes to her life
by believing in the church, and living the principles of the gospel, and is
able to put the rest aside. It isn’t so much that she sees the issues as
inconsequential, but that her testimony of Joseph Smith and the church he
founded is a net positive for herself and her family.
I respect the position she has chosen to take, and I admire
her ability to see the good while acknowledging the negative aspects of church
history. I don’t understand it, but I respect it. And I’m very grateful that
she would freely share her feelings with me without being threatened by my
questions. She is an exemplary Mormon, and I love her, in spite of her
religious leanings…. (insert smiley face emoticon….:)
Still, I don’t get it. I look over at my husband, choosing
to believe in Joseph Smith the prophet, in spite of Joseph Smith the polygamist
(and cheating liar), and I don’t get it.
Which I guess explains why I’m out, and he stays in. He
doesn’t need it to make sense. He doesn’t require his prophet to be without
flaws. And I don’t either, necessarily. I just don’t consider marrying multiple
women without his wife’s consent to be a character flaw. It’s a flaming red
flag, and all the evidence I need that Joseph Smith was not a prophet. In my
humble opinion, his deeds were not godly, and could not possibly be sanctioned
by any supreme being worthy of worship.
In conclusion, DH and I will have to continue to agree to
disagree. But, for the record, he’s wrong, and I’m right.
Just don’t try to tell him that. He won’t get it.
Sunday, May 14, 2017
Great Expectations
“As hard as you think it’s going to be, you wind up wishing
it was that easy.” Emma Horton, on her death bed, to her husband, Flap, who has
just confidently asserted that he will carry on raising their children after
she is gone. (Terms of Endearment)
I’m not a fan of Mother’s Day.
I love being a mother, and I love my children. I am extraordinarily grateful that I was able to participate in the creation of their
lives. Bearing and raising children is a gift from the universe that I honor
and respect.
That being said, I am not a fan of Mother’s Day.
As a teenager, I remember on one occasion telling my mother
that I couldn’t wait until I had children of my own, because I was sure I’d do
a better job than she was doing. The naivete is astounding, isn’t it?
Growing up, I always thought I’d be a mother, and I always
believed I’d be good at it. I didn’t feel that I had many gifts and talents,
but for some reason, I always believed in my ability to parent when the time
came.
I had my first child shortly before turning 30. I had been a
pediatric nurse for several years by this time, and I was comfortable around
infants and children. And yet, when my own baby was less than a week old, I
tearfully begged my mother not to leave me alone with her because I WASN’T
READY TO BE A MOTHER.
The reality of actually being someone’s mother was far more
terrifying than I had anticipated, and my confidence fled.
The 27 years since that day have taught me that I was right
to be afraid. The job has challenged me in ways I never imagined possible.
If someone compliments my skills as a nurse, I proudly
accept their praise without pause. If someone tells me I’m a good wife, I agree
and smile.
If someone tells me I am a good mother, I hem and haw and
stammer as I attempt to brush off the compliment.
Why, I wonder?
I think the answer lies in expectations. (Which, according to Anne
Lamott, are “resentments under construction.”)
Way back in my youth, when I imagined myself as a mom, I
pictured a passel of mini-me’s running around at my feet, pausing to gaze at me
in adoration, listening raptly as I read to them, or instructed them, or
scolded them. I pictured myself patiently explaining the reasons for my
discipline, which would always be received with gratitude. I imagined them
coming home to me after school and telling me of their day while eating the
cookies I had baked with love and drinking the milk I had freshly drawn from
the cow in our backyard.
Really! Ok, not really. I never wanted a cow in my backyard.
But the rest? Yes, I was that naĂŻve.
What I neglected to factor in was the personalities of the
littles I was imagining in my future.
Our kids come “with their bags packed” (thanks, Ann Cannon).
Their personalities are hard-wired from conception. They are not blank slates
waiting for us to imprint our wishes and desires on them. Nor are they
miniature replicas of us, their parents, authors of their creation.
Each of my kids is a unique being, with his or her own
individual predisposing traits and characteristics. I should have anticipated
that, right? But I was completely unprepared for how very different they would
be. From me, from their dad, and from each other.
A wise therapist once told me, as I lamented the trials and
travails of parenting, that I should bring my best self to the task, and if
that wasn’t good enough for my kids, it became their problem.
This is a great philosophy, in theory. In practice, not so
much.
Because even when I know I have brought my best self (and on
occasion, I have), and my children are still not happy, I can’t be happy. I can’t
let it be their problem alone.
Because I am their mother, and their happiness is my
responsibility.
Or so I’ve been told.
By my culture, my church, my peers. And my children.
If my children aren’t happy, or successful, I am to blame. It’s
on me.
And no matter how many times I tell myself that they are the
authors of their own destinies, that they alone are responsible for their own
happiness, I don’t believe it.
The conditioning runs deep.
So I dislike Mother’s Day because it serves to highlight the
expectations I had of motherhood that have turned to disappointment.
It brings into harsh relief the times I feel I have failed
my children.
And no matter how much Hallmark wants me to believe
otherwise, the voice inside my head won’t let me accept any credit for how
great my kids actually are. Only the blame for their failures.
As a youth, I imagined motherhood would come easily to me. As
a new mom, holding my firstborn and tearfully begging my own mother not to
leave me alone, I knew the job would be difficult. As a veteran mother, I now
wish it was only as hard as I had then imagined it would be.
Incidentally, my own mother did not leave me alone that day.
She may have left me physically, but emotionally, mentally, and in all other
ways, she has been beside me every step of the way, encouraging me and cheering
me on. If I have had any success at all, it has been because my mother held me
up, and showed me the way.
Maybe, someday, my own children will say the same of me.
Friday, May 5, 2017
Serendipity
My dad received a scary medical diagnosis this week. My
wonderful, loving father, who is 82.
When my mom called to tell me, I could hardly comprehend her
words. My dad has been my hero all my life, and I can’t imagine a world
without him in it. I’ve been the luckiest of daughters to have him for a father.
The phone call took place in the evening, the night before I
was to work an early shift at the hospital. I have to rise at 4:00 AM to be at
the hospital by 5, which for a former night owl is painful. I went to bed soon
after the call, and as I attempted to settle myself for the night, thoughts of
my dad’s demise kept creeping in and disturbing my peace. I finally drifted off
into dreamland, but slept fitfully, waking at 2:45 AM, planning his funeral.
I work on a unit which cares for post-surgical patients,
many of whom share my father’s diagnosis. As luck would have it (or as I like
to call it, serendipity), one of our newest, and brightest, surgeons walked
onto the unit just as I was telling a coworker of my fears for my dad’s
imminent departure from mortality.
I asked the surgeon for a moment of his time, and told him
of my father’s diagnosis. His words brought immediate relief, and hope.
He explained to me the various ways the diagnosis could be
interpreted, depending on the particulars of the biopsy results, and the
treatment options available. He described the medical interventions that could
be considered should further testing prove the situation to be more dire than
we know at present, and provided me with information that calmed my fears, and
eased my mind.
After our conversation, I called my mother to tell her what
I had learned. She shared my relief to hear that this diagnosis was not a death
sentence for my father.
At the conclusion of our previous conversation, when she had
first shared the bad news, she told me that the family would be fasting
together this Sunday. She said that she knew I no longer participated in
religious practices like fasting, but she didn’t want me to feel left out. She
seemed tentative and unsure, as if she feared that I would mock a revered
religious rite.
I told her that while she was correct that I no longer
believed in fasting as a manipulative attempt to force God’s hand and influence
the outcome, I do believe in fasting as a unifying practice that connects
families and friends in solidarity and love. I just don’t think going without
food for a prescribed number of hours will get God’s attention and ensure that
my dad’s life will be spared. (I didn’t use these exact words, as I am
sensitive to my mother’s sacred beliefs and do not intend to mock them.)
To be fair, my mother doesn’t believe her fasting and
prayers will guarantee a desired outcome, but she will admit, if I were to
press the issue, that she is hoping to impress upon God her devotion and
obedience in exchange for a blessing of health, thereby obtaining for her husband a
miraculous cure.
My issue with fasting, with the intent of procuring a
blessing of health and/or happiness, is that I can’t believe in a Supreme Being
who would reward only those who denied themselves food and drink and prostrated
themselves in humble supplication. After all, the scriptures tell us that rain
falls upon the just and the unjust. As do good health and long lives.
And we all know good souls who were pure in heart who did
not survive a scary medical diagnosis. My mother-in-law is a case in point. No
one better ever walked the earth. Her life was taken by cancer, in spite of
fervent fasting and urgent pleas begging to spare her life. And in the end, no
one blamed God for not answering those particular prayers. Rather, he was
thanked and given credit for having provided life lessons.
Isn’t that the way it goes? Prayers are answered in the
affirmative and our loved ones live, and we thank God. Prayers are not answered
the way we would like them to be, and our loved ones die, and we thank God. God
never loses.
You know what I do believe in? Science. And medicine.
Doctors who spend years learning about the human body and its processes, and
then spend years using that learning to save and improve lives.
I know my parents also believe in science and medicine, or
they would have spurned modern medicine and gone straight to prayer and
fasting. There are those amongst the religious who do so, generally at their
peril.
But you know what really irks me? In the end, no matter
which direction this diagnosis goes, God will be the one who gets all the
credit. God will be thanked for sparing my father’s life, if he does survive
this. God will be praised for stepping up and granting my family’s petition
that my dad be healed. And if he isn’t healed, and this is the end for him? God
will also be praised. Like I said, God never loses.
Know who should get the credit? The doctors who diagnose
him, and operate on him, and provide radiation treatment, and prescribe
life-saving medication. The nurses who provide gentle and compassionate care as
he recuperates. The ancillary services who are there to draw labs and clean
rooms and take x-rays. All of those people who work so diligently to share with
my dad their skills and knowledge so that he might go on to live many more
years with the family who loves him.
The family who will credit God with my father’s survival,
should he outlive this scary diagnosis.
I know my mother will find comfort through prayer and
fasting with her family. I found comfort in the words of a knowledgeable and
skilled surgeon. I guess I am putting my faith in the arms of flesh, since
those arms have held many lives in their hands, and come out victorious. I’m
hoping for a similar outcome for my dad.
As much as I believe in love, and family, and connection, I
also believe in the power of science, and the dedication of those willing to
sacrifice years in the pursuit of life-saving knowledge and skills.
And if the outcome isn’t what I hope for? I will thank the
medical community for their efforts, and I will be grateful for the years I did
have with my beloved dad.
And I will thank my beloved dad for being my dad.
Sunday, April 23, 2017
Some people never learn....
Know what's the most Mormon thing you can do?
Allow someone else to control the narrative.
Let someone else tell you who you can be friends with, and who you can talk to.
Refuse to follow the evidence and see where the truth lies.
Cling so tight to your confirmation bias that you vilify the wrong person.
Turn your back on people you once loved because they weren't afraid to call the emperor naked.
That's the most Mormon thing you can do.
Allow someone else to control the narrative.
Let someone else tell you who you can be friends with, and who you can talk to.
Refuse to follow the evidence and see where the truth lies.
Cling so tight to your confirmation bias that you vilify the wrong person.
Turn your back on people you once loved because they weren't afraid to call the emperor naked.
That's the most Mormon thing you can do.
Friday, April 21, 2017
Feelings
“.... whoa whoa whoa feelings….”
Feelings matter.
I read a facebook comment today testifying of the Book of
Mormon, stating, “I feel the spirit touch my soul when I read it. It tells me
that what I’m reading really happened.”
Feelings matter.
But they don’t verify truth.
As a former Mormon, I have spent a lot of time contemplating
feelings. ‘The Spirit’ is much mocked amongst my peers on the fringes of
Mormonism. We don’t like to admit that we are guided by feelings, or ‘The
Spirit’, but rather by fact, and reason, and logic. Those things matter too,
maybe as much or more so than feelings.
But, feelings matter.
For years, I had a gut feeling that the church was not true. I ignored it, preferring to put my faith in the feelings of my beloved
parents that the church was true. With a capital T. I couldn’t let myself go
there. I couldn’t allow my brain to consider the implications inherent in
acknowledging my own feelings. To do so meant giving room to the doubts that
threatened to tear my world apart, and I had no idea what my new reality would
look like. I couldn’t envision a life without the church.
Now? I feel peace, and wonder, and awe. Making space for my
feelings opened me up to so many new possibilities. I regret that I
didn’t listen to my feelings sooner. Decades of doubt buried deep makes for
quite a mess.
I had a feeling that I should marry Boston Bob. Boston Bob
did not share my feeling. Had I persisted and pursued Boston Bob based on my
feeling, Boston Bob might have had a feeling that I should be arrested and
charged with stalking. He wouldn’t have been wrong to pursue that feeling.
When my now beloved spouse asked me to marry him, I had a
feeling that I should say yes. It was perhaps the strongest feeling I’ve ever
had that I should do any one thing, and, in this particular case, my feeling
led to 28 years of wedded bliss. For me. I cannot speak for my beloved. Though
I suspect he shares my feelings, based on his actions.
Upon the birth of my third child, I had a feeling that I
should have a fourth. I resisted this feeling, as I had no desire to repeat
pregnancy at my advanced age. But the feeling was persistent, and, eventually,
we had that fourth child. She is a delightful addition to our family, and I’m
so grateful that I gave heed to that feeling.
However, I have many friends who have had similar feelings
that another child awaited their family, and those feelings did not lead to
another child. As they have shared their stories with me, I feel their grief
that what they most hoped for and dreamed of did not come to pass, in spite of
their feelings that it would.
Feelings matter. But they don’t verify truth.
I know many people, good and honest people, who testify that
they know the church is true. Their feelings are so strong they resemble
knowledge. I also know many people who have testified that the church was true,
only to realize later that it wasn’t.
Feelings do not verify truth.
Feelings do not verify truth.
Feelings can point us in the right direction and help us
find truth. And, sometimes, in the absence of truth, feelings can lead us to
that which is good. Or so I’ve heard. I know many people who have doubts about
the truthfulness of the church, but stay because they believe it is good. I
don’t subscribe to this philosophy myself. I don’t believe good can exist in
the absence of truth. My feelings tell me so.
Growing up, whenever I was presented with a choice in life, my father would ask, “What does your gut tell you?” Often, if I would
stop and listen to my gut, my feelings, I would find the answer I was looking
for. But not always. Remember Boston Bob? My gut told me he was ‘the one’. He
told me he wasn’t. My feelings couldn’t change that fact. However, the
experience did teach me to scrutinize my feelings a little closer. Had I done
so then, perhaps I would have realized that BB and I were not a good fit, and
my feeling was nothing more than desire masquerading as ‘the spirit’ testifying
that I had found ‘the one’. I was attracted to BB, I liked spending time with
BB, and I thought he would make a good celestial spouse. When I told God all of
this, in fervent prayer, he confirmed my feeling with a testimony that BB
was ‘the one’. Looking back, knowing what I know now, BB and I would have been
a disaster. My beloved, ‘the one’, was, and is, the right fit for me. My
feelings, combined with our shared history of wedded bliss, provide all the
confirmation I need.
Feelings matter. I pay attention to my feelings, and I
examine them closely for nuggets of truth. I trust my feelings, because they
have often led me to good things. Like my beloved spouse, and my delightful
child.
But, they do not verify truth.
Boston Bob did not want to marry me, and the church is not
true.
Wednesday, April 12, 2017
Easter
It’s Easter this week. Religious holidays have presented a
bit of a conundrum for me since my faith collapsed.
Actually, Easter has always puzzled me. What do a giant
Easter bunny and Peeps have to do with the resurrection of a savior of mankind?
As it turns out, very little.
Easter, like most Christian holidays, has its origins in
paganism. It marked the end of the cold winter season and the beginning of new
life, as evidenced by leafy buds on trees and tulips poking their heads up out
of the ground. How the bunny got involved depends on what source you consult.
Suffice it to say, the Christian celebration of Easter is an amalgamation of
legends and stories culminating in hunting for colored eggs and eating lots of
jelly beans. Or something to that effect. Oh, and then also going to church and
thinking about Jesus. In new clothes.(I'm wearing the new clothes. Not Jesus. Though, come to think of it, his attire probably was new. Or refurbished. Okay, now I'm wandering into blasphemous territory. Sorry.)
In my household growing up, my parents separated the secular
from the religious by giving us Easter baskets on Saturday morning, leaving
Sunday free for worship. My mother never told us that our baskets full of candy
and trinkets came from a giant bunny; she didn’t want us to be confused when it
came to Jesus and his sacrifice. As it turns out, her lack of context left me befuddled
anyway. I never could figure out how it was all related. I just knew that we
colored boiled eggs on Friday, got a basket of goodies on Saturday and had an
Easter Egg hunt in the backyard, then went to church on Sunday morning wearing
a new dress. I was expected to sit still in that new dress, hyped up on fake
chocolate Easter eggs, and think about how Jesus died on a cross. For me. So I
could go live with Heavenly Father again.
As you can clearly see, religious worship never really took
with me.
Mormons sort of bastardized the entire Easter celebration
and the Lenten season. Lent, from my limited understanding, is a time of
personal sacrifice. As a Mormon, I was not taught in the ways of Lent, and I never
knew anyone who practiced it religiously, pun intended, but I knew many people
who trivialized the concept by giving up such things as Diet Coke or sugar.
I decided this year that I wanted to understand Lent from a
religious perspective, so I accepted a friend’s invitation to attend a Lenten
service at a nearby church.
I felt like a voyeur.
As I listened to the pastors recite scriptures, and the
congregation respond out loud by repeating particular phrases, I searched my
heart for any feeling that could be interpreted as the spirit. And I felt none.
Nothing. I was void of anything remotely resembling a spiritual experience.
There was nothing familiar about the setting or the
proceedings. Even the hymns were different from those I’d heard as a Mormon. The
people were dressed casually, and the room looked like any other community
gathering spot. It was completely unlike any church service I had experienced
growing up.
I wasn’t exposed to different religious traditions by my
parents. They believed Mormonism was True, with a capital T, and saw no need to
branch out. I do not blame them for this. They had all they needed, and they
believed they were leading their family back to God via the LDS church; what
would have been the point of attending other religions?
So, as I sat through the unfamiliar service, I was
mystified. I looked around me at the congregation gathered to worship their
savior. I wondered at the devotion that had led them to seek salvation at the
hands of a jealous god, and I searched their faces carefully for some clue to
their dedication.
I listened to their hymns, and wondered why my heart
remained still. Am I missing the devotion gene? How did reverence for sacred
things so completely pass me by? Why is my heart not fertile ground for the
seed of faith?
What is the difference between me, an agnostic borderline
atheist who cannot decide if a supreme being exists and cares about humanity,
and an adherent of Christianity? What is it that leads worshipers to seek a
savior, and to mark their faces with ashes as a sign of their devotion and
penitence? Or to don sacred, holy underwear? To tithe their ten percent? To
sacrifice half their weekend in pursuit of connection with divinity?
Honestly, I have no answers. All I know is that the service
left me cold and wanting. I felt nothing more than admiration for those who are
willing and able to set aside worldly things with softened hearts and allow the
spirit of god to take root. I often wish I could be one of them.
But the feeling passes quickly as I contemplate the Mexican
food my friend promised me in exchange for my presence beside her as she
worshiped.
I guess that makes me an adherent of gastrolatry. I worship
food. I can work with this. Granted, it costs more than ten percent of my
income, but the rewards are immediate, and filling. Pass the salsa.
Tuesday, March 28, 2017
My Self
A Pole, a Jew, and Mormon walked into a bar. It’s not a joke.
It was girl’s night out.
I spent last evening with 2 very dear friends, whom I met as
Shakespeare moms when our kids participated in Logan Youth Shakespeare. We have
bonded over parenting woes, marital issues, self-esteem challenges, and the
changes that come with a journey through mortality.
Last night, as we visited and commiserated, one theme
emerged from the detritus of our conversation.
In order to be the best mom, the best wife, the best person,
we need to be our best self.
And how do we accomplish that?
We spent over three hours hashing out the concept of loving
oneself, throwing around ideas like setting intentions, expressing gratitude,
and listing, daily, three things to like about oneself. That last one is every
bit as hard as it seems.
Why? Why is it so hard to see the good in ourselves? Why do
we struggle to like who we see in the mirror? Where did this internal,
infernal, negative self-dialogue originate?
It’s hard to pinpoint exactly, but a likely culprit
is the societal expectation that to avoid conceit, we must practice humility. I
just think we’ve Inigo Montoya’d humility….. it doesn’t mean what we think it
means.
The hard truth is that if I had a friend who talked to me
the way I sometimes talk to myself, I would detach from that friend. Sayanara,
frenemy.
And if I treated my children the way I occasionally treat
myself, the authorities would be notified. With good reason.
And here’s another hard truth: every relationship we have,
every single one, will eventually end. Every person who loves us will
eventually leave us. Sometimes it is through choice, as friendships naturally fade
and affection dies. Or geography intervenes. Or offense occurs and separation
becomes necessary.
Sometimes it is through death, as these mortal bodies do
tend to wear out and quit on us. Through no fault of our own, in the end, it
all ends. We all die, every last one of us. Which is the ultimate separation.
No matter what you believe about life after death, the death of a loved one
will mean at least a temporary separation, and it hurts. But it is inevitable.
We all die.
There is, however, one relationship that endures to the end.
One exception to the rule that all relationships must end. One person who will
be with us ‘til the bitter end. One person who will stay beside us through
thick and thin, rain or shine, in sickness and in health, for richer or for
poorer.
I am, of course, speaking of the self.
I grew up with the notion that to be self-centered was
wicked and sinful. I was taught, by my religious community, that to truly
become divine, I must deny the self, and focus my efforts on others.
I do see beauty in this concept of self-denial and unselfish
service, but I also believe that the concept of being self-centered has been
given a bad rap. An undeserved one.
How can we be anything but self-centered? Who are we if not
our ‘self’? If we have no center, we have no soul, and no well from which to
draw when serving others.
To be self-centered is to be grounded. It allows us to serve
from a place of love, stability, security. If our goal is to serve and love others,
wouldn’t it be prudent to begin with ourselves? To be ‘self’ centered?
Years ago, when I first started to practice yoga, I took my
mat into my quiet front room where I could be undisturbed. As I finished and
settled into prayer pose, I looked up at the wall in front of me and took in
the picture of Jesus hanging there, and the plaque next to it. “Be still and
know that I AM”. The words struck me as never before.
Be still, and know that I am.
I am.
I exist, I am real, I am here.
I am, and that is all that I know. All that I have in this
life that is a sure thing, all that I can know, is that I AM.
All my preconceived notions about the meaning of life faded
away, and I knew, in that moment, that what really mattered, what really
matters, is that I AM.
Religion tells us that the purpose of life is to focus on
others. Pop culture tells us that to be fulfilled we should focus on ourselves.
I think we need to land somewhere in the middle, and begin
by nurturing the most important relationship any of us will ever have. Maybe by
strengthening our ‘self’, we will be able to offer love, comfort, and safety to
others, and live a fulfilling life, with purpose and intention.
How to best strengthen that ‘self’? That’s a discussion for
another day.
In the meantime, go look in the mirror and tell your self
that she’s (or he’s) amazing!
(I know, it feels weird, hippy-dippy and new-agey, strange
on every level! Do it anyway! Your self will thank you!)
Monday, March 20, 2017
Lucky
We celebrated our 28th anniversary this week.
We got married on St. Patrick’s Day, 1989. The holiday
itself wasn’t on our radar at the time. As Mormons, St. Patrick doesn’t have
much of a place in our traditions. We don’t worship saints, and we don’t drink
beer, green or otherwise.
However, the day did prove to be fortuitous. We got lucky.
(Not like that!) (Okay, yes, like that…. but this is not that kind of a blog...)
We each have come to the conclusion that we are lucky to
have the other. There can be no better conclusion for spouses, in my opinion.
A couple of days before our anniversary, our son asked if we
planned to celebrate. It was a fair question, considering the epic battle he
had witnessed the day before. We’ve had our share of arguments, like any
married couple, but that one felt bigger, and the atmosphere in our home
reflected it.
We responded to our son that of course we were going to
celebrate! 28 years of marriage deserves to be recognized, and celebrated. Even
if the celebrants are locked in battle over the current state of affairs.
Marriage, we told our son, is like that. Ups and downs have figured prominently
in our journey. Fortunately, for us, more ups than downs.
As related in a previous post, there happened to be a pretty
big elephant in our room. Church, and the attendance thereof.
Daron had admitted to me that he didn’t like attending
alone. And since I dislike attending at all, we had reached an impasse. There
seemed to be no way forward that would satisfy the both of us.
As we embarked on our anniversary celebration, with our
previous conversation still hanging heavy in the air, the atmosphere was
slightly tense. But, my husband, being a man (and yes, this seems to be a male
trait), was able to set it aside in the interest of an evening away from the
stresses of home and family. Basically, he was looking forward to gettin’ some.
We had chosen to spend the night at a local inn. Just being
away for a night is cause for celebration. We really do enjoy one another’s
company, more so when away from our own cluttered environment and needy
children.
As the evening progressed, our conversation turned to the
event 28 years ago that had changed both our lives. For good, I might add.
He asked what I remembered most about the day. My clearest
recollection is feeling cherished by him as we proceeded through the ceremony
in the temple. He was attentive and chivalrous, making me feel adored.
I asked what he remembered most. He responded, “Driving to
dinner after the ceremony and watching you take off your girdle in the front
seat of the car. No woman had ever removed a piece of clothing in my car
before.”
Okay, then.
He then asked if I had any regrets. I gave his question the
thoughtful consideration it deserved, and answered, honestly, “No, no regrets.
None.”
(Except for that girdle. I regret that. Haven’t worn one
since.)
What about him, I asked? Regrets?
No, he replied. Not one.
Really? I responded. None? You don’t regret marrying someone
who started out Mormon, and ended up a happy agnostic atheist?
No, he said. I love the woman you have become as much as I
loved the woman I married. More, even.
Wow. In that moment, it became even more clear to me how lucky I am to be married to him.
He does not tolerate the changes in me; he celebrates them.
He celebrates me. He loves me, all the parts of me.
How can I, then, not rejoice in all the parts of him? He is
religious, to the core. He has a strong testimony that the Mormon church is The
Church of Jesus Christ, and that Joseph Smith was a prophet. He is not timid in
his expression of his faith, and he does not hesitate to share what he believes
he knows to be true when the opportunity presents itself.
And you know what? I wouldn’t change that about him either.
It is part of what makes him who he is. His testimony centers him, and helps
form the core of strength that defines him. Without his belief in the gospel,
and Jesus, who would he be? Of course, there is no way to know, but I will
happily accept his faith as an integral and essential part of his being,
because I love that being with all my heart and soul.
My leaving the church didn’t destroy our marriage. I
believe, in retrospect, it strengthened it. We each had to figure out who we
were in relationship to the divine, without leaning on the other. Because in
the end, a testimony is deeply personal, and the acquiring of one is
accomplished through solitary introspection. It isn’t, or shouldn’t be, reliant
upon the testimony of one’s mate.
Daron doesn’t like going to church alone, but he does it.
When I stopped going, he was forced to figure out what mattered to him, and he
had to come to the conclusion, on his own, that he would prefer to go alone
than not go at all.
So is it sad that we don’t share a faith in God? A little,
maybe.
But I find joy in our journey through and beyond my faith
transition, because we have each arrived at a place of peace with regards to
God’s existence.
Daron continues going to church, alone, because he believes
in it.
I continue not going to church, at all, because I don’t
believe in it.
And we continue to love and support one another on our
chosen paths.
As he prepared to leave the house for church this afternoon, I looked at him in his suit and tie, and I felt lucky.
I am lucky to be married to a man who loves God, and me.
There is room for us both.
Wednesday, March 15, 2017
Chaos
I can’t control my brain, my thoughts. They keep returning
to ruminate over stupid conversations that happened, and those that didn’t.
What I should have done, what I should have left undone.
Since I can’t control my thoughts, I have turned to my surroundings,
thinking that maybe by bringing order to my environment, I can bring order to
my mind.
Also, I am married to a hoarder-wanna-be. Just one of
several glaring differences in our chosen lifestyles.
I have been attempting to unclutter our house, starting with
the closets down the hall. I have managed to wrestle a bit of order out of the
chaos, but it is introducing more chaos into my marriage.
Yesterday, as I started on the kitchen cupboards, my husband
walked into the room and stared in horror at the box of castoffs I had
collected. His reaction was anticipated, which is why I’ve been performing my
cleaning covertly, while he is out of the house. Unfortunately for me, his
schedule is rather unpredictable, and he is apt to return at inopportune moments
and catch me in the act. As he did yesterday.
I will admit my approach wasn’t perhaps the best. No one
reacts well to being called on their bad habits. And keeping anything and
everything, in the event that it might be needed some day, is a bad habit. In
my eyes, anyway. Not so much in his. But the way I’ve pointed it out cannot be
interpreted by him as anything but adversarial.
So yesterday. He stormed across the room and took a look at
what I had removed from a cupboard. A cupboard, I might add, that is
inconveniently located, and doesn’t store anything of importance. In my humble
opinion. He, however, must have felt that his very way of life was under
attack, because he grabbed a couple of items I had set aside for donation,
clutched them to his breast, and proclaimed them worthy to remain in our
possession.
I reacted… overreacted… by bursting into tears and calling
him a hoarder.
Bad move.
Our conversation quickly devolved into a heated argument
about clutter versus order. Neither of us took the high road, unfortunately.
All of this in front of the two kids who currently reside with us.
I’m not proud.
But still kinda mad.
I retreated to our bedroom, asking him to follow, hoping to
continue our conversation away from tender ears prone to catastrophizing any
and every argument into a sure sign of impending divorce.
Hubby headed out to the garage. I assumed he had no interest
in conversing with a hysterical, screaming banshee wife, so I locked the
bedroom door, as a show of maturity, climbed onto the bed, and bawled my eyes
out.
When he came to the bedroom door, as I figured he would, and
found it locked, he picked up the bobby pin kept on the table in the hall
(intended for just such a purpose, though usually used to unlock the teenager’s
door when she thinks she can keep us out), unlocked the door, and let himself
in.
True to his nature, he was calm and controlled. Gah. Doesn’t
actually help calm me down. Maybe that’s why he does it. He knows it serves to
further rile me up and encourage histrionics. I’m pretty predictable that way.
I found myself attempting to explain to him what clutter
does to my mind and spirit. How it further deepens the depression that has taken
root this year and resists all attempts to remove it. How much I crave an
orderly environment, and how much I enjoy removing what seems to be useless
crap.
I guess my raging tears didn’t do much to further
communication. He didn’t seem to be moved. Though he did remain calm.
He said he was offended at my assumption that if I left, or
died, our house would be profiled on an episode of Hoarders inside of a week.
He said it reminded him of another assumption I had made, earlier in our
married life, that hadn’t proved true.
Many years ago, while raising our young children, we had
been a pretty typical Mormon family. I was the one mostly invested in our
eternal salvation, or so it seemed, and I felt like I was single-handedly
dragging my family to the celestial kingdom. Whenever I was sick, or had to
work, my husband did not fight the good fight and take our children to church,
prompting me to assert that if I were to die, I was sure my children would
never again darken the doorway of a chapel.
He has thrown this particular assumption in my face from
time to time in the ensuing years, because as fate would have it, I have been
the one who has refused to darken the doorway of a chapel. For reasons too many
to enumerate here, I am done with church, and my children have followed suit.
My husband, the man I claimed would not make the effort to ensure their
continued involvement in the activity most likely to lead them to salvation, is
the only one who continues to attend faithfully.
He is a true-blue believer, one who has been “gifted to
know”.
I am a die-hard unbeliever, one who has been gifted with
skepticism. And I can no longer support an institution that purports to be the
“one true church” while ignoring the skeletons in its closet, and continues to
treat those who don’t fit the box as pariahs, unfit for the kingdom of god. (My
story, my perspective, get over it.)
I asked him, yesterday, in the heat of battle, why he hadn’t
bothered to take our kids to church when they were young if I couldn’t go, and
he responded, “Because I hate going to church alone.”
And there it was.
The words hung heavy in the air, giving meaning to the
phrase “pregnant pause”.
The elephant in the room had been identified.
He hates going to church alone. And I hate going to church.
Period. Full stop.
We are at an impasse.
After all these years of battling our religious divide, it
comes down to this.
If I go to church with him so he doesn’t have to go alone, I
am unhappy.
If I don’t go to church with him and he goes alone, he is
unhappy.
There are no winners here. No solution or compromise that
suits us both.
I have no idea how to fix this. It won’t be as easy as
lugging a carload of junk to the dump and then explaining why he can’t find his
“good can with a lid that fits”.
I wonder if I can donate Jesus to “Somebody’s Attic”?
Nah. My husband would just go buy him back.
Sigh. It is what it bloody is.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)